• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MassDevice

The Medical Device Business Journal — Medical Device News & Articles | MassDevice

  • Special Reports
  • Technologies
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Cardiovascular
    • Orthopedics
    • Neurological
    • Diabetes
    • Surgical Robotics
  • Business & Finance
    • Wall Street Beat
    • Earnings Reports
    • Funding Roundup
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Initial Public Offering (IPO)
    • Legal News
    • Personnel Moves
    • Medtech 100 Stock Index
  • Regulatory
    • Food & Drug Administration (FDA)
    • Recalls
    • 510(k)
    • Pre-Market Approval (PMA)
    • MDSAP
    • Clinical Trials
  • Resources
    • About MassDevice
    • Leadership in Medtech
    • Manufacturers & Suppliers Search
    • MedTech100 Index
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • In-Depth Coverage
    • Latest News
  • Attend DeviceTalks
    • Events
      • DeviceTalks Minnesota – May 4
      • DeviceTalks Boston – May 27–28
      • DeviceTalks West
      • DeviceTalks Tuesdays
    • DeviceTalks Podcast Network
      • DeviceTalks Weekly
      • AbbottTalks
      • Boston ScientificTalks
      • DeviceTalks AI
      • IntuitiveTalks
      • MedtechWOMEN Talks
      • MedtronicTalks
      • Neuro Innovation Talks
      • Ortho Innovation Talks
      • Structural Heart Talks
      • StrykerTalks
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Home » FDA rejects Ocular Therapeutix’ Dextenza post-operative pain indication

FDA rejects Ocular Therapeutix’ Dextenza post-operative pain indication

July 25, 2016 By Fink Densford

Ocular TherapeutixOcular Therapeutix (NSDQ:OCUL) said today it received a complete response letter from the FDA denying approval for its Dextenza for an indication for treating ocular pain occurring after ophthalmic surgery.

Ocular Therapeutix’s Dextenza, formerly known as OTX-DP, is designed to deliver sustained dosage of dexamethasone over 4 weeks using a hydrogel plug inserted into a tear duct. The plug then dissolves and is flushed from the body as tears.

The Bedford, Mass.-based company said the FDA raised concerns related to “deficiencies in manufacturing process and controls” which were identified during a pre-New Drug Application approval inspection of its manufacturing facility.

Ocular Therapeutix said the FDA’s letter did not provide details as to which manufacturing deficiencies remain open since the company’s last response.

“We have previously responded to all requests in an effort to address the manufacturing items raised by the FDA during the application process, and we await completion of the review. Importantly, there were no clinical issues identified in the CRL pertaining to efficacy or safety related to the post-surgical pain indication. Labeling discussions with the FDA are ongoing. We remain optimistic that Dextenza will be approved once these open manufacturing items are closed. We will continue to work collaboratively with the FDA so they can finalize their review of our NDA, and are committed to bringing Dextenza to market as rapidly as possible,” CEO Amar Sawhney said in a press release

The company said it will be required to resolve the manufacturing deficiencies identified during the FDA facility inspection before its NDA will be approved, and clarified that the FDA’s letter did not identify “any efficacy or safety concerns with respect to the clincial data provided in the NDA” and that it does not need any additional clinical trials to win FDA approval.

In June, Ocular Therapeutix saw shares dive over 40% after reporting the 2nd phase 3 clinical trial of its Dextenza drug-device combination failed to meet its primary endpoint.

The primary endpoint for the company’s 2nd Phase III trial of the device, which was exploring the efficacy of the device at treating ocular itching for patients with allergic conjunctivitis, was a significant reduction in ocular itching at 7, 14 and 21 days, the company said.

Results from the study indicated a lower, but not statistically significant difference between the placebo group and those implanted with Dextenza, Ocular Therapeutix reported.

This isn’t the 1st miss for Ocular Therapeutix, which failed to meet a key endpoint during the 2nd clinical trial exploring the efficacy of the device for treating pain & inflammation following cataract surgery.

Filed Under: Food & Drug Administration (FDA), Optical/Ophthalmic, Regulatory/Compliance Tagged With: oculartherapeutix

More recent news

  • DePuy Synthes launches next-generation automated fracture fixation system
  • FDA clears at-home dental dressing for non-surgical periodontal procedures
  • CVRx taps new CFO from Nyxoah
  • BD brings on new chief information and digital officer from Lenovo
  • Cooper Companies continues to see activist pressure to sell divisions, replace CEO

Primary Sidebar

Cart

“md
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest med device regulatory, business and technology news.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >
MDO ad
MDO ad

Footer

MASSDEVICE MEDICAL NETWORK

DeviceTalks
Drug Delivery Business News
Medical Design & Outsourcing
Medical Tubing + Extrusion
Drug Discovery & Development
Pharmaceutical Processing World
MedTech 100 Index
R&D World
Medical Design Sourcing

DeviceTalks Webinars, Podcasts, & Discussions

Attend our Monthly Webinars
Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

MASSDEVICE

Subscribe to MassDevice E-Newsletter
Advertise with us
About
Contact us

Copyright © 2026 · Arrowfly LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Arrowfly.

Privacy Policy