• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MassDevice

The Medical Device Business Journal — Medical Device News & Articles | MassDevice

  • Special Reports
  • Technologies
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Cardiovascular
    • Orthopedics
    • Neurological
    • Diabetes
    • Surgical Robotics
  • Business & Finance
    • Wall Street Beat
    • Earnings Reports
    • Funding Roundup
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Initial Public Offering (IPO)
    • Legal News
    • Personnel Moves
    • Medtech 100 Stock Index
  • Regulatory
    • Food & Drug Administration (FDA)
    • Recalls
    • 510(k)
    • Pre-Market Approval (PMA)
    • MDSAP
    • Clinical Trials
  • Resources
    • About MassDevice
    • Leadership in Medtech
    • Manufacturers & Suppliers Search
    • MedTech100 Index
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • In-Depth Coverage
    • Latest News
  • Attend DeviceTalks
    • Events
      • DeviceTalks Minnesota – May 4
      • DeviceTalks Boston – May 27–28
      • DeviceTalks West
      • DeviceTalks Tuesdays
    • DeviceTalks Podcast Network
      • DeviceTalks Weekly
      • AbbottTalks
      • Boston ScientificTalks
      • DeviceTalks AI
      • IntuitiveTalks
      • MedtechWOMEN Talks
      • MedtronicTalks
      • Neuro Innovation Talks
      • Ortho Innovation Talks
      • Structural Heart Talks
      • StrykerTalks
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Home » Ocular Therapeutix plunges on missed endpoint in eye drug trial

Ocular Therapeutix plunges on missed endpoint in eye drug trial

April 7, 2015 By Brad Perriello

Ocular Therapeutix plunges on missed endpoint in eye drug trial

Ocular Therapeutix (NSDQ:OCUL) yesterday said its lead drug candidate, OTX-DP, failed to meet a key endpoint the 2nd clinical trial of the eye drug in reducing pain and inflammation after cataract surgery.

The news, coming just a month after OTX-DP met the goals of a 1st Phase III trial, sent OCUL shares down 33.5% to $25.46 apiece in pre-market trading today.

The treatment is designed to deliver sustained dosage over 4 weeks of the drug dexamethasone, using a hydrogel plug inserted into a tear duct. The plug then dissolves and is flushed from the body as tears. In March, Bedford, Mass.-based Ocular said the 1st, 247-patient trial showed that 33.7% of patients treated with OTX-DP showed no inflammatory cells in the eye after 14 days, compared to 14.6% of those receiving a placebo. Some 76.1% of patients receiving the drug reported no pain after 8 days, compared to 36.1% of the placebo arm.

Yesterday Ocular said the 2nd, 240-patient trial met its pain endpoint – absence of pain after 8 days – but missed the inflammation endpoint, absence of inflammatory cells after 14 days. Although 77.5% of patients in the OTX-DP arm reported no pain after 8 days, compared with 58.8% of the control arm, the difference in inflammatory cell counts after 14 days was not statistically significant (39.4% vs. 31.3%), the company said, noting that both endpoints had to be met to consider the study a success.

There were no ocular or treatment-related serious adverse events in either trial and the rate of serious adverse events was lower for the treatment group than for the control group, the company said. The Company expects to be able to use the safety data from these Phase 3 trials to support its other OTX-DP clinical development programs including allergic conjunctivitis.

President & CEO Amar Sawhney said the company plans to meet with the FDA "promptly" to discuss the results and "chart the appropriate path forward." The safety data, he said, "will serve as a foundation for the regulatory submissions for other indications with this product."

Ocular Therapeutix said it plans to pursue other indications for OTP-DX, including allergic conjunctivitis.

"Although the efficacy results for the absence of inflammatory cells in the OTX-DP treatment group met our expectations, the placebo group response was significantly higher than expected. We have begun a thorough analysis of the data from the 2nd Phase 3 trial to fully understand the difference in efficacy between these 2 trials that had essentially the same trial design and similar patient populations," Sawhney said in prepared remarks, noting that a post-hoc analysis of the data from both trials showed a significant difference in the absence or low level of inflammatory cells (66.3% for OTX-DP vs. 42.5% for the placebo arm).

Material from Reuters was used in this report.

Filed Under: News Well, Optical/Ophthalmic Tagged With: Clinical Trials, oculartherapeutix

More recent news

  • DePuy Synthes launches next-generation automated fracture fixation system
  • FDA clears at-home dental dressing for non-surgical periodontal procedures
  • CVRx taps new CFO from Nyxoah
  • BD brings on new chief information and digital officer from Lenovo
  • Cooper Companies continues to see activist pressure to sell divisions, replace CEO

Primary Sidebar

Cart

“md
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest med device regulatory, business and technology news.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >
MDO ad
MDO ad

Footer

MASSDEVICE MEDICAL NETWORK

DeviceTalks
Drug Delivery Business News
Medical Design & Outsourcing
Medical Tubing + Extrusion
Drug Discovery & Development
Pharmaceutical Processing World
MedTech 100 Index
R&D World
Medical Design Sourcing

DeviceTalks Webinars, Podcasts, & Discussions

Attend our Monthly Webinars
Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

MASSDEVICE

Subscribe to MassDevice E-Newsletter
Advertise with us
About
Contact us

Copyright © 2026 · Arrowfly LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Arrowfly.

Privacy Policy