• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MassDevice

The Medical Device Business Journal — Medical Device News & Articles | MassDevice

  • Special Reports
  • Technologies
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Cardiovascular
    • Orthopedics
    • Neurological
    • Diabetes
    • Surgical Robotics
  • Business & Finance
    • Wall Street Beat
    • Earnings Reports
    • Funding Roundup
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Initial Public Offering (IPO)
    • Legal News
    • Personnel Moves
    • Medtech 100 Stock Index
  • Regulatory
    • Food & Drug Administration (FDA)
    • Recalls
    • 510(k)
    • Pre-Market Approval (PMA)
    • MDSAP
    • Clinical Trials
  • Resources
    • About MassDevice
    • Leadership in Medtech
    • Manufacturers & Suppliers Search
    • MedTech100 Index
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • In-Depth Coverage
    • Latest News
  • Attend DeviceTalks
    • Events
      • DeviceTalks Minnesota – May 4
      • DeviceTalks Boston – May 27–28
      • DeviceTalks West
      • DeviceTalks Tuesdays
    • DeviceTalks Podcast Network
      • DeviceTalks Weekly
      • AbbottTalks
      • Boston ScientificTalks
      • DeviceTalks AI
      • IntuitiveTalks
      • MedtechWOMEN Talks
      • MedtronicTalks
      • Neuro Innovation Talks
      • Ortho Innovation Talks
      • Structural Heart Talks
      • StrykerTalks
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Home » FDA solicits comment on custom device review

FDA solicits comment on custom device review

November 23, 2012 By MassDevice staff

FDA logo

The FDA is seeking public comment on its custom medical device exemption criteria following some changes implemented through the FDA Safety & Innovation Act, which was signed into law earlier this year.

The proposed rules include 4 main tenets for fitting the definition of a custom medical device as well as limits on annual production and use.

The federal watchdog agency is seeking "information on and examples of appropriate uses" of the custom medical device exemption system, especially input from patients, manufacturers, dentists and physicians on circumstances in which they have or would like to use custom devices.

The FDA’s custom device criteria, according to a federal notice, include exemption for a device which fits the following definitions:

  1. Is “created or modified in order to comply with the order of an individual physician or dentist (or any other specially qualified person designated under regulations promulgated by the Secretary after an opportunity for an oral hearing)”;
  2. must not be “generally available in the United States in finished form through labeling or advertising by the manufacturer, importer, or distributor for commercial distribution”;
  3. must be for the purpose of treating a “unique pathology or physiological condition that no other device is domestically available to treat”; and
  4. must be manufactured for the “special needs of such physician or dentist (or other specially qualified person so designated) in the course of the professional practice of the physician or dentist (or other specially qualified person so designated)” or by an individual patient named in such order.

The new rule also requires that a custom device only treat "a sufficiently rare condition such that conducting clinical investigations on such device would be impractical," and production must be limited to no more than 5 such devices per year, according to a FDA notice in the Federal Register.

Medical device makers have experienced some snafus over the custom medical device exemption system.

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) subsidiary DePuy Orthopaedics in January announced it would discontinue its custom orthopedics division after in response to an FDA warning following an inspection of the Warsaw, Ind.-based company’s facilities.

Mid-January the FDA’s Centers for Devices & Radiological Health released a letter warning DePuy that certain custom devices and components sold by the company need new PMA or 510(k) applications.

The watchdog agency detailed more than a dozen devices or device components it said lacked proper FDA clearance or which were modified in ways that merit a new 510(k) application.

Just days after the warning was unsealed, DePuy announced that it would permanently stop production of all custom devices, not just the dozen or so listed in the warning letter, DePuy spokeswoman Jessica Masuga confirmed with MassDevice.com at the time.

Filed Under: Food & Drug Administration (FDA), News Well

More recent news

  • AiM Medical Robotics’ $2M NIH grant and other extra medtech news
  • Intuitive draws on data from 14M cases to back da Vinci systems
  • Ropca wins FDA clearance for ultrasound automation systems
  • Zimmer Biomet lets go of former Nevro CEO amid leadership restructuring
  • Petal Surgical says its first-in-human incisionless surgery is coming soon and offers a first glimpse of its system

Primary Sidebar

Cart

“md
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest med device regulatory, business and technology news.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >
MDO ad
MDO ad

Footer

MASSDEVICE MEDICAL NETWORK

DeviceTalks
Drug Delivery Business News
Medical Design & Outsourcing
Medical Tubing + Extrusion
Drug Discovery & Development
Pharmaceutical Processing World
MedTech 100 Index
R&D World
Medical Design Sourcing

DeviceTalks Webinars, Podcasts, & Discussions

Attend our Monthly Webinars
Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

MASSDEVICE

Subscribe to MassDevice E-Newsletter
Advertise with us
About
Contact us

Copyright © 2026 · Arrowfly LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Arrowfly.

Privacy Policy