• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MassDevice

The Medical Device Business Journal — Medical Device News & Articles | MassDevice

  • Special Reports
  • Technologies
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Cardiovascular
    • Orthopedics
    • Neurological
    • Diabetes
    • Surgical Robotics
  • Business & Finance
    • Wall Street Beat
    • Earnings Reports
    • Funding Roundup
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Initial Public Offering (IPO)
    • Legal News
    • Personnel Moves
    • Medtech 100 Stock Index
  • Regulatory
    • Food & Drug Administration (FDA)
    • Recalls
    • 510(k)
    • Pre-Market Approval (PMA)
    • MDSAP
    • Clinical Trials
  • Resources
    • About MassDevice
    • Leadership in Medtech
    • Manufacturers & Suppliers Search
    • MedTech100 Index
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • In-Depth Coverage
    • Latest News
  • Attend DeviceTalks
    • Events
      • DeviceTalks Minnesota – May 4
      • DeviceTalks Boston – May 27–28
      • DeviceTalks West
      • DeviceTalks Tuesdays
    • DeviceTalks Podcast Network
      • DeviceTalks Weekly
      • AbbottTalks
      • Boston ScientificTalks
      • DeviceTalks AI
      • IntuitiveTalks
      • MedtechWOMEN Talks
      • MedtronicTalks
      • Neuro Innovation Talks
      • Ortho Innovation Talks
      • Structural Heart Talks
      • StrykerTalks
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Home » Feds sue Medtronic for disability discrimination

Feds sue Medtronic for disability discrimination

July 30, 2019 By Brad Perriello

Medtronic logo updatedThe U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission yesterday sued Medtronic (NYSE:MDT) for disability discrimination, alleging that the company illegally fired a South Carolina employee because of a disability.

April Jackson worked as a temporary forklift driver at a Medtronic facility in Greenwood, S.C., from Oct. 3, 2016, until she was fired Feb. 10, 2017, according to the EEOC lawsuit. Jackson, who has congenital abnormalities including the absence of one kidney and an under-formed, dysfunctional bladder, missed several of her night shifts after seeking medical treatment Feb. 6 for health issues stemming from her condition, the suit alleged.

Medtronic fired her over the absences, despite a doctor’s note excusing Jackson from work for three days, the EEOC alleged.

“Despite Jackson’s doctor’s instruction not to return to work, Jackson, who worked the night shift, timely reported for work at or around midnight on the evening of Feb. 6, 2017. Jackson attempted to work her full shift but left early due to her disability,” according to the complaint, filed yesterday in the U.S. District Court for South Carolina. “[P]rior to leaving her shift early, Jackson provided her shift supervisor, an employee of defendant, with two copies of the doctor’s note excusing Jackson from work until Feb. 9, 2017. Jackson requested that her supervisor provide a copy of the note to defendant’s human resources department once human resources arrived for the day.

“The absences that resulted in Jackson’s alleged violation of defendant’s attendance policy were, with one exception, due to Jackson’s disability,” the EEOC alleged, adding that a request by Jackson’s employment agency that Medtronic reconsider in light of her disability and her doctor’s note was ignored. The agency also alleged that Medtronic didn’t hire Jackson as a permanent employee due to her disability, “despite being in the process of doing so prior to her termination.”

The commission said it attempted to negotiate a remedy with Medtronic but was “unable to secure from defendant a conciliation agreement acceptable to the commission,” according to the complaint, which alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The EEOC suit seeks back pay and compensatory and punitive damages for Jackson, plus permanent injunctions barring further disability-based discrimination and mandating that Medtronic establish equal opportunity practices for the disabled.

“Not only does the ADA protect employees, including temporary employees, from disability discrimination in the workplace, it places an affirmative requirement on employers to explore accom­modations to their generally applicable employment policies, such as attendance policies,” EEOC regional attorney for the Charlotte district office Lynette Barnes said in prepared remarks. “An employer simply cannot ignore an employee’s need for a reasonable accommodation of a disability, choosing instead to fire the employee.”

Medtronic did not respond to a request for comment.

Filed Under: Featured, Legal News Tagged With: Medtronic

More recent news

  • Steris inks $2.1B deal for operating room supplier Xodus Medical
  • Insulet’s Omnipod Discover data platform begins full US rollout
  • Siemens Healthineers exits general ultrasound to focus on cardiac imaging
  • Johnson & Johnson MedTech sets mid-2027 target for ortho spinoff, as Q3 device sales disappoint
  • Olympus receives FDA warning letter after international inspections

Primary Sidebar

“md
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest med device regulatory, business and technology news.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >
MDO ad
MDO ad

Footer

MASSDEVICE MEDICAL NETWORK

DeviceTalks
Drug Delivery Business News
Medical Design & Outsourcing
Medical Tubing + Extrusion
Drug Discovery & Development
Pharmaceutical Processing World
MedTech 100 Index
R&D World
Medical Design Sourcing

DeviceTalks Webinars, Podcasts, & Discussions

Attend our Monthly Webinars
Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

MASSDEVICE

Subscribe to MassDevice E-Newsletter
Advertise with us
About
Contact us

Copyright © 2026 · Arrowfly LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Arrowfly.

Privacy Policy