• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MassDevice

The Medical Device Business Journal — Medical Device News & Articles | MassDevice

  • Special Reports
  • Technologies
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Cardiovascular
    • Orthopedics
    • Neurological
    • Diabetes
    • Surgical Robotics
  • Business & Finance
    • Wall Street Beat
    • Earnings Reports
    • Funding Roundup
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Initial Public Offering (IPO)
    • Legal News
    • Personnel Moves
    • Medtech 100 Stock Index
  • Regulatory
    • Food & Drug Administration (FDA)
    • Recalls
    • 510(k)
    • Pre-Market Approval (PMA)
    • MDSAP
    • Clinical Trials
  • Resources
    • About MassDevice
    • Leadership in Medtech
    • Manufacturers & Suppliers Search
    • MedTech100 Index
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • In-Depth Coverage
    • Latest News
  • Attend DeviceTalks
    • Events
      • DeviceTalks Minnesota – May 4
      • DeviceTalks Boston – May 27–28
      • DeviceTalks West
      • DeviceTalks Tuesdays
    • DeviceTalks Podcast Network
      • DeviceTalks Weekly
      • AbbottTalks
      • Boston ScientificTalks
      • DeviceTalks AI
      • IntuitiveTalks
      • MedtechWOMEN Talks
      • MedtronicTalks
      • Neuro Innovation Talks
      • Ortho Innovation Talks
      • Structural Heart Talks
      • StrykerTalks
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Home » Capitol Hill: Medical Technology Caucus still split on device tax repeal

Capitol Hill: Medical Technology Caucus still split on device tax repeal

February 21, 2012 By MassDevice staff

Eric Cantor

Rep. Eric Cantor

Rep. Erik Paulsen (R-Minn.) may have 228 co-sponsors for his bill to repeal the medical device tax, but he’s still missing some key members of the congressional caucus formed to support the medical device industry.

About 25 of the 66 members of the Medical Technology Caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives have yet to sign on as co-sponsors on Paulsen’s H.R. 436: Protect Medical Innovations Act.

Notable missing signatures include a key member of the House leadership, Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA), who as the House Majority Leader wields significant power in influencing which bills are brought before the House for a vote.

Sign up to get our free newsletters delivered straight to your inbox

The caucus, formed in 1993, "does not endorse legislation or take positions on policy matters," according to its web site; it serves as a forum to discuss issues relating to medical technology.

Nearly all of the caucus’ GOP members have co-sponsored Paulsen’s bill, along with a smattering of House Democrats. Cantor, along with Rep. David Dreier (R-CA) are the lone GOP caucus members that have yet to sign on to the bill.

Paulsen told MassDevice last week that he expects a vote on the bill this year, as his efforts have gained traction with congressional members from both parties.

"I actually expect that this is going to move forward in the House sometime this year, hopefully sooner than later," he told us. Based on the number of co-sponsors on the bill, a straight up-or-down vote for repeal would clearly pass in the GOP-controlled House. However, it’s unlikely that the bill would pass in the Senate.

One of the reasons the repeal bill has not come before a vote is because House Republicans still have a disagreement over how to proceed.

"A lot of my colleagues, including leadership, felt that once we had a vote for repeal [of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act], that that was adequate, and some of the more conservative members of the House, didn’t want to pick and choose."

Still, Paulsen believes that his efforts have some momentum, even among some Democrats.

"There are some Democratic members who have not signed on to the repeal bill because they’re a little nervous about acknowledging that the health care law they may have voted for isn’t perfect," he said. "They’re more inclined to vote for it if they get the opportunity to vote on the floor, rather than sign their name on it and deal with a sort of push-back among some of their own base."

As for his own party’s leadership, Paulsen believes they’re getting the message.

"My leadership says it makes sense to vote on this separately," he said. "It’s one of these processes where all of a sudden we’re voting on something else because leadership has decided to push some other initiative through."

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: U.S. Congress

More recent news

  • Massachusetts Life Sciences Center offers grants to lower medtech commercial risk
  • The 10 largest medical device companies
  • CSL to drop Terumo for Haemonetics in US plasma collection supply deal
  • How 5 medtech CEOs design for access
  • Butterfly Network to chase ultrasound brain-computer interfaces with newcomer Bridge Neurotech

Primary Sidebar

“md
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest med device regulatory, business and technology news.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >
MDO ad
MDO ad

Footer

MASSDEVICE MEDICAL NETWORK

DeviceTalks
Drug Delivery Business News
Medical Design & Outsourcing
Medical Tubing + Extrusion
Drug Discovery & Development
Pharmaceutical Processing World
MedTech 100 Index
R&D World
Medical Design Sourcing

DeviceTalks Webinars, Podcasts, & Discussions

Attend our Monthly Webinars
Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

MASSDEVICE

Subscribe to MassDevice E-Newsletter
Advertise with us
About
Contact us

Copyright © 2026 · Arrowfly LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Arrowfly.

Privacy Policy