• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MassDevice

The Medical Device Business Journal — Medical Device News & Articles | MassDevice

  • Special Reports
  • Technologies
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Cardiovascular
    • Orthopedics
    • Neurological
    • Diabetes
    • Surgical Robotics
  • Business & Finance
    • Wall Street Beat
    • Earnings Reports
    • Funding Roundup
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Initial Public Offering (IPO)
    • Legal News
    • Personnel Moves
    • Medtech 100 Stock Index
  • Regulatory
    • Food & Drug Administration (FDA)
    • Recalls
    • 510(k)
    • Pre-Market Approval (PMA)
    • MDSAP
    • Clinical Trials
  • Resources
    • About MassDevice
    • Leadership in Medtech
    • Manufacturers & Suppliers Search
    • MedTech100 Index
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • In-Depth Coverage
    • Latest News
  • Attend DeviceTalks
    • Events
      • DeviceTalks Minnesota – May 4
      • DeviceTalks Boston – May 27–28
      • DeviceTalks West
      • DeviceTalks Tuesdays
    • DeviceTalks Podcast Network
      • DeviceTalks Weekly
      • AbbottTalks
      • Boston ScientificTalks
      • DeviceTalks AI
      • IntuitiveTalks
      • MedtechWOMEN Talks
      • MedtronicTalks
      • Neuro Innovation Talks
      • Ortho Innovation Talks
      • Structural Heart Talks
      • StrykerTalks
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Home » Axonics loses IP challenge to Medtronic patents

Axonics loses IP challenge to Medtronic patents

September 14, 2021 By Sean Whooley

Axonics MedtronicMedtronic (NYSE:MDT) announced that it picked up three victories in an intellectual property (IP) dispute against Axonics (NSDQ:AXNX) over sacral neuromodulation devices.

According to a news release, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) rejected Axonics’ attempt to invalidate three Medtronic patents in its IP infringement lawsuit related to Medtronic’s InterStim neuromodulation device family. Nearly one year ago, the PTAB handed down a decision to reject one of Axonics’ claims to invalidate a Medtronic patent and has now added three more.

Axonics develops the r-SNM sacral neuromodulation system, which it touts as the first of its kind approved for sale in the U.S., Europe, Canada and Australia and the only SNM device approved for full-body MRI scans without needing the device explanted.

The company, a direct competitor of Medtronic in the space, has rivaled the medtech giant with multiple regulatory nods for its technology, including winning FDA pre-market approval in November 2019 for the treatment of overactive bladder and urinary retention, which followed the FDA approval that r-SNM won in September for fecal incontinence.

In November 2019, Medtronic (NYSE:MDT) filed a lawsuit against Axonics in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, alleging infringements of four patents for Medtronic’s SNM technologies indicated for bowel and bladder conditions.

Axonics, in response, filed seven claims over the ‘069 patent, which concerns charging an implantable medical device having a battery. PTAB determined that “there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition,” and instituted an inter partes review related to six of the Axonics claims.

Last year, the PTAB rejected without hearing the challenge to Medtronic’s 324 patent and found that Axonics’ arguments lacked merit, with that decision final and not appealable, Medtronic said.

The latest PTAB decisions uphold all claims in Medtronic’s U.S. Patent Nos. 8,036,756 and 8,626,314, which protects technology related to its tined leads; and upholds claim 7 in Medtronic’s U.S. Patent No. 7,774,069 (‘069 patent), which protects technology related to its recharge power control.

“Medtronic is pleased with the PTAB’s decisions today,” Medtronic EVP & president of the neuroscience portfolio Brett Wall said in the release. “We believe competition drives innovation and is good for the industry and for patients. We also believe that protecting our proprietary technology and intellectual property is vital to our business.”

On the third patent (‘069) the PTAB invalidated four of the five claims that Axonics challenged. Axonics plans to appeal the PTAB’s decisions on the claims it declined to invalidate, claiming in a news release that the decision relates only to the issue of invalidity or patentability of Medtronic’s patents and does not mean that Axonics infringes on any of the patents in question.

“We are quite pleased with the PTAB’s decision to invalidate four of the five key claims of the ‘069 Patent, which reflects the merit of the compelling arguments we presented and represents a significant victory for Axonics,” Axonics CEO Raymond W. Cohen said in the release. “We respectfully disagree with the PTAB’s decision on the claims it declined to invalidate, and we intend to appeal. It’s also important to understand that the PTAB rulings are not related to the notion of infringement – they are simply addressing whether or not the claims in these patents are valid as a starting point. We are confident that we will ultimately prevail on all of the patent claims Medtronic has asserted against us.”

 

This article, originally published on September 14, was updated with additional information from Axonics on September 15.

Filed Under: Business/Financial News, Featured, Legal News, Neurological, Neuromodulation/Neurostimulation, Patent Infringement Tagged With: Axonics Modulation Technologies, Medtronic, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO)

More recent news

  • Zimmer Biomet, Think Surgical extend exclusive distribution agreement
  • Cambridge Heartwear inks £184M deal to supply NHS with portable ECG monitors
  • J&J, Smith+Nephew plans for ortho megamerger reportedly fall through
  • California and Massachusetts still reign as top US medtech headquarters locations
  • Teleflex wins Breakthrough Device designation for Freesolve resorbable scaffold

About Sean Whooley

Sean Whooley is a senior editor who mainly produces work for MassDevice, Medical Design & Outsourcing and Drug Delivery Business News. He received a bachelor's degree in multiplatform journalism from the University of Maryland, College Park. You can connect with him on LinkedIn or email him at [email protected].

Primary Sidebar

“md
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest med device regulatory, business and technology news.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >
MDO ad
MDO ad

Footer

MASSDEVICE MEDICAL NETWORK

DeviceTalks
Drug Delivery Business News
Medical Design & Outsourcing
Medical Tubing + Extrusion
Drug Discovery & Development
Pharmaceutical Processing World
MedTech 100 Index
R&D World
Medical Design Sourcing

DeviceTalks Webinars, Podcasts, & Discussions

Attend our Monthly Webinars
Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

MASSDEVICE

Subscribe to MassDevice E-Newsletter
Advertise with us
About
Contact us

Copyright © 2026 · Arrowfly LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Arrowfly.

Privacy Policy