• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

MassDevice

The Medical Device Business Journal — Medical Device News & Articles | MassDevice

  • Latest News
  • Technologies
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Cardiovascular
    • Orthopedics
    • Neurological
    • Diabetes
    • Surgical Robotics
  • Business & Finance
    • Wall Street Beat
    • Earnings Reports
    • Funding Roundup
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Initial Public Offering (IPO)
    • Legal News
    • Personnel Moves
    • Medtech 100 Stock Index
  • Regulatory & Compliance
    • Food & Drug Administration (FDA)
    • Recalls
    • 510(k)
    • Pre-Market Approval (PMA)
    • MDSAP
    • Clinical Trials
  • Special Content
    • Special Reports
    • In-Depth Coverage
    • DeviceTalks
  • Podcasts
    • MassDevice Fast Five
    • DeviceTalks Weekly
    • OEM Talks
      • AbbottTalks
      • Boston ScientificTalks
      • DeviceTalks AI
      • IntuitiveTalks
      • MedtechWOMEN Talks
      • MedtronicTalks
      • Neuro Innovation Talks
      • Ortho Innovation Talks
      • Structural Heart Talks
      • StrykerTalks
  • Resources
    • About MassDevice
    • DeviceTalks
    • Newsletter Signup
    • Leadership in Medtech
    • Manufacturers & Suppliers Search
    • MedTech100 Index
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
Home » Wrong-site surgery: The problem continues

Wrong-site surgery: The problem continues

April 18, 2011 By MassDevice Contributors Network

By Kristin Simoens

Wrong-site surgery continues to be more prevalent than thought and without any consistent evidence of slowing. Research has repeatedly shown that these adverse events are largely underreported with compliance of physician reporting ranging from 5 percent to 50 percent – thus predicting true incidence of wrong-site surgery to be hovering around 50 per week or 2600 events per year in the US alone. Costs beyond the obvious cardinal one of patient outcomes are multi-factorial for the healthcare system as well as the patient and reach into the millions.

Sponsored by Ximedica

Extensive research has proven that wrong-site surgery results from several contributing factors.

Human Factors:

  • Heavy workload environment
  • Fatigue
  • Pressure to move quickly
  • Multiple and changing team members
  • Lack of accountability
  • Team communications

Patient Factors:

  • Patient not consulted prior to sedation
  • Patient confusion on site and side
  • Commonality among patient names


Procedure Factors:

  • Patient position or room change prior to initiating procedure
  • The sea of blue draping can mask patient position and anatomy
  • Similar procedures back-to -back-to –back
  • Cross- checking site/side data that is originated from the same source

What We Know

Even with strict adherence to the Universal Protocol, wrong-site surgery has not decreased and continues to fall under national scrutiny — and additional checklists are not the answer.

Most of the work to date on remedying wrong-site surgery has focused on activities that take place in the operating room. As several patient safety experts have pointed out, little has been accomplished in studying and improving the steps leading up to the OR since The Joint Commission introduced its Universal Protocol in 2003. Moreover, the actual continuum of the patient journey from pre-op to the OR has not been carefully examined. The data supports the need for additional work in these areas — 60 percent of wrong-site surgery cases are rooted in either mis-steps or communication before and throughout the patient entering and transitioning to the OR.

What We Need To Know

Which staff is accountable during prep, before the team and patient enter the OR, and before the first incision is made — and how many of those staff members remain with the patient the whole time? Are pre-op activities and OR activities best aligned to mitigate the risk prone elements of the system?

Bottom line, hospitals need to deconstruct the entire patient journey — from the time the need for surgery is identified to the time the procedure takes place, in order to identify and resolve all the error prone activities that make up the surgical identification process.

By Kristin Simoens is Director of Healthcare Delivery Solutions for Ximedica

Filed Under: Hospital Care, News Well, Surgical Tagged With: Ximedica LLC

More recent news

  • Autonomix picks up key nerve ablation catheter patent
  • Affluent Medical can move to pivotal phase of artificial urinary sphincter study
  • Globus Medical announces $500M share repurchase program
  • Cook Medical warns of issue with angiographic catheter
  • Virtuoso Surgical reports first cases with robotic endoscopy system, plans FDA IDE submission

Primary Sidebar

“md
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest med device regulatory, business and technology news.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >

MEDTECH 100 Stock INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.
MDO ad

Footer

MASSDEVICE MEDICAL NETWORK

DeviceTalks
Drug Delivery Business News
Medical Design & Outsourcing
Medical Tubing + Extrusion
Drug Discovery & Development
Pharmaceutical Processing World
MedTech 100 Index
R&D World
Medical Design Sourcing

DeviceTalks Webinars, Podcasts, & Discussions

Attend our Monthly Webinars
Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

MASSDEVICE

Subscribe to MassDevice E-Newsletter
Advertise with us
About
Contact us

Copyright © 2025 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy