• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

MassDevice

The Medical Device Business Journal — Medical Device News & Articles | MassDevice

  • Latest News
  • Technologies
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Cardiovascular
    • Orthopedics
    • Neurological
    • Diabetes
    • Surgical Robotics
  • Business & Finance
    • Wall Street Beat
    • Earnings Reports
    • Funding Roundup
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Initial Public Offering (IPO)
    • Legal News
    • Personnel Moves
    • Medtech 100 Stock Index
  • Regulatory & Compliance
    • Food & Drug Administration (FDA)
    • Recalls
    • 510(k)
    • Pre-Market Approval (PMA)
    • MDSAP
    • Clinical Trials
  • Special Content
    • Special Reports
    • In-Depth Coverage
    • DeviceTalks
  • Podcasts
    • MassDevice Fast Five
    • DeviceTalks Weekly
    • OEM Talks
      • AbbottTalks
      • Boston ScientificTalks
      • DeviceTalks AI
      • IntuitiveTalks
      • MedtechWOMEN Talks
      • MedtronicTalks
      • Neuro Innovation Talks
      • Ortho Innovation Talks
      • Structural Heart Talks
      • StrykerTalks
  • Resources
    • About MassDevice
    • DeviceTalks
    • Newsletter Signup
    • Leadership in Medtech
    • Manufacturers & Suppliers Search
    • MedTech100 Index
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
Home » Wright Medical contests $11m hip verdict

Wright Medical contests $11m hip verdict

January 29, 2016 By Brad Perriello

Wright Medical Q3 tops rev, misses earningsWright Medical (NSDQ:WMGI) yesterday asked a federal judge in Georgia to toss the $11 million verdict from the 1st bellwether trial in the multidistrict litigation filed over its Conserve metal-on-metal hip implant.

An Atlanta jury last year awarded plaintiff Robyn Christiansen $1 million in compensatory damages and another $10 million in punitive damages. The jury found Nov. 24 that the Conserve device was defective and that Wright failed to adequately warn patients about its risks.

The 2-week trial was the 1st of roughly 550 product liability lawsuits filed over the Conserve implant that have been consolidated before Judge William Duffey Jr. of the U.S. District Court for Northern Georgia. The jury, which deliberated for 3 days, initially found that the device was not defectively designed and was not defective when it was sold for implantation in Christiansen.

Yesterday Wright re-submitted a motion for judgment as a matter of law, arguing that Duffey was wrong to re-submit the case to the jury after the 1st verdict came down.

“The court should have dismissed any additional findings by the jury as surplusage and contrary to the instructions on the verdict form and the court’s jury instructions at the end of trial,” Wright argued, according to court documents. “The jury was biased, confused, or both, as reflected by, among other facts, (i) the internal inconsistencies in the original verdict returned on Nov. 20, 2015, (ii) the irreconcilable inconsistencies between the original verdict and 2nd verdict returned on Nov. 24, 2015, and (iii) the jury’s apparent inability to deliberate effectively or follow the court’s instructions.”

As an alternative, should Duffey decline to toss the verdict, he should grant a new trial because the jury ultimately found that Wright proved that the Conserve device could not be made 100% safe and that its benefits outweighed the risks, the company said.

“Plaintiff’s strict liability design defect claim was therefore barred as a matter of law and Wright Medical was entitled to judgment in its favor on plaintiff’s strict liability design defect claim,” Wright argued.

Memphis-based Wright also argued that Duffey erred in his jury instructions when he said the company had to prove that the Conserve device was properly made and had adequate directions and warnings. The negligence finding should also be overturned because the jury didn’t find that Wright failed to use reasonable care.

“There is no legal basis for an award of punitive damages in the verdict returned on November 24, 2015. Punitive damages are not an independent claim under Utah law and can only be awarded in connection with certain claims. As a matter of law, the jury’s finding that Wright Medical made negligent misrepresentations as to the hip replacement components implanted in plaintiff does not support an award of punitive damages under Utah law,” the company averred.

Alternatively, Duffey should strike the punitive damages award because no reasonable jury would have found Wright conduct willful and malicious, intentionally fraudulent or knowingly reckless, the company said. If he declines to toss the punitive award, he should reduce is, Wright said, contending that the 10-to-1 ratio is excessive and contrary to Utah’s 3-to-1 rule.

Christiansen also ought to accept a reduction in the $1 million compensatory damages award because it was “contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence, including the parties’ stipulation as to medical expenses, and disproportionate to any injuries suffered by plaintiff,” Wright said.

Filed Under: Legal News, Orthopedics, Product Liability Tagged With: wrightmedical

More recent news

  • Medtronic earns CE mark for redo TAVI procedure
  • Natus Neuro launches BrainWatch AI-driven, point-of-care EEG
  • Boston Scientific has positive real-world Acurate Prime TAVI data
  • Johnson & Johnson MedTech launches ultrasound catheter for imaging in cardiac ablation procedures
  • Onward reports more successful BCI implants

Primary Sidebar

“md
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest med device regulatory, business and technology news.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >

MEDTECH 100 Stock INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.
MDO ad

Footer

MASSDEVICE MEDICAL NETWORK

DeviceTalks
Drug Delivery Business News
Medical Design & Outsourcing
Medical Tubing + Extrusion
Drug Discovery & Development
Pharmaceutical Processing World
MedTech 100 Index
R&D World
Medical Design Sourcing

DeviceTalks Webinars, Podcasts, & Discussions

Attend our Monthly Webinars
Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

MASSDEVICE

Subscribe to MassDevice E-Newsletter
Advertise with us
About
Contact us

Copyright © 2025 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy