• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MassDevice

The Medical Device Business Journal — Medical Device News & Articles | MassDevice

  • Special Reports
  • Technologies
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Cardiovascular
    • Orthopedics
    • Neurological
    • Diabetes
    • Surgical Robotics
  • Business & Finance
    • Wall Street Beat
    • Earnings Reports
    • Funding Roundup
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Initial Public Offering (IPO)
    • Legal News
    • Personnel Moves
    • Medtech 100 Stock Index
  • Regulatory
    • Food & Drug Administration (FDA)
    • Recalls
    • 510(k)
    • Pre-Market Approval (PMA)
    • MDSAP
    • Clinical Trials
  • Resources
    • About MassDevice
    • Leadership in Medtech
    • Manufacturers & Suppliers Search
    • MedTech100 Index
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
    • In-Depth Coverage
    • Latest News
  • Attend DeviceTalks
    • Events
      • DeviceTalks Minnesota – May 4
      • DeviceTalks Boston – May 27–28
      • DeviceTalks West
      • DeviceTalks Tuesdays
    • DeviceTalks Podcast Network
      • DeviceTalks Weekly
      • AbbottTalks
      • Boston ScientificTalks
      • DeviceTalks AI
      • IntuitiveTalks
      • MedtechWOMEN Talks
      • MedtronicTalks
      • Neuro Innovation Talks
      • Ortho Innovation Talks
      • Structural Heart Talks
      • StrykerTalks
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
Home » Sutherland rub testing: How to get the best information from your testing regimen

Sutherland rub testing: How to get the best information from your testing regimen

November 5, 2014 By MassDevice Contributors Network

DDL

By Levi Loesch, Product and Materials Engineer, Product and Materials Division, DDL, Inc.

When labeling a product, ensuring that you are using the best combination of materials to present the product as intended to the end user and reduce cost as much as possible are major considerations. There are a seemingly unlimited number of different types of label materials and inks both with different properties. When it comes to quickly and easily testing the durability of inks and substrates of prospective materials, there’s no better test than ASTM D5264; Standard Practice for Abrasion Resistance of Printed Materials by the Sutherland Rub Tester.

DDL recently added the capability to perform the Sutherland rub test and it became immediately apparent that there is some misunderstanding of what Sutherland rub testing is and the information that it provides. This article will explain the basic purpose of the test and the type of information one should expect to gain from a well-designed test program.

The Sutherland rub test is designed to provide qualitative, comparative data for the abrasion durability of multiple label constructions. The ASTM standard does not provide any pass/fail criteria for the testing as the test is only for comparing relative performance and not designed to set a particular standard. The test is not designed to replace any other tests (transportation simulation testing, for instance) which may, directly or indirectly, give information about the suitability of a label construction.

In order to effectively test multiple label constructions, there are three test variables that must be adjusted in order to optimize the testing. These variables are:

  • Test weight (2 lb. or 4 lb.)
  • Number of test cycles
  • Test speed
    • A high test speed is desirable, but the speed must be chosen so that frictional heating doesn’t influence test results.

The goal is to choose the test variables such that when the test is complete, there is a clear difference in the degree of degradation of each label type. For instance, if the test setup is too rigorous, all labels will be degraded to the point that there will be no way to determine which performed the best. On the opposite side, if the test is not stringent enough, even the weakest construction may not show any degradation. Typically, an exploratory test is required to be performed for each different label construction to best determine the optimum test variable settings to use for testing all label constructions.

When qualifying several possible label constructions, it is important to understand the objective of Sutherland rub testing and the information it can provide. A well-designed experiment can help you determine the ink and substrate combination that gives you the most durable and cost-effective solution for your particular application.

Filed Under: Blog, News Well Tagged With: Contributed Blogs

More recent news

  • Citi downgrades Boston Scientific as cyberattack recovery compounds competitive pressure
  • Autonomix taps former Medtronic FDA counsel head for board of directors
  • Medtronic strengthens robotic surgery position with Cornerstone deal, analysts say
  • Science Corp. names president as it looks to roll out vision-restoring implant
  • Mindray looks to fill hospital ventilator gap left by Philips’ exit

Primary Sidebar

Cart

“md
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest med device regulatory, business and technology news.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >
MDO ad
MDO ad

Footer

MASSDEVICE MEDICAL NETWORK

DeviceTalks
Drug Delivery Business News
Medical Design & Outsourcing
Medical Tubing + Extrusion
Drug Discovery & Development
Pharmaceutical Processing World
MedTech 100 Index
R&D World
Medical Design Sourcing

DeviceTalks Webinars, Podcasts, & Discussions

Attend our Monthly Webinars
Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

MASSDEVICE

Subscribe to MassDevice E-Newsletter
Advertise with us
About
Contact us

Copyright © 2026 · Arrowfly LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Arrowfly.

Privacy Policy