• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

MassDevice

The Medical Device Business Journal — Medical Device News & Articles | MassDevice

  • Latest News
  • Technologies
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Cardiovascular
    • Orthopedics
    • Neurological
    • Diabetes
    • Surgical Robotics
  • Business & Finance
    • Wall Street Beat
    • Earnings Reports
    • Funding Roundup
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Initial Public Offering (IPO)
    • Legal News
    • Personnel Moves
    • Medtech 100 Stock Index
  • Regulatory & Compliance
    • Food & Drug Administration (FDA)
    • Recalls
    • 510(k)
    • Pre-Market Approval (PMA)
    • MDSAP
    • Clinical Trials
  • Special Content
    • Special Reports
    • In-Depth Coverage
    • DeviceTalks
  • Podcasts
    • MassDevice Fast Five
    • DeviceTalks Weekly
    • OEM Talks
      • AbbottTalks
      • Boston ScientificTalks
      • DeviceTalks AI
      • IntuitiveTalks
      • MedtechWOMEN Talks
      • MedtronicTalks
      • Neuro Innovation Talks
      • Ortho Innovation Talks
      • Structural Heart Talks
      • StrykerTalks
  • Resources
    • About MassDevice
    • DeviceTalks
    • Newsletter Signup
    • Leadership in Medtech
    • Manufacturers & Suppliers Search
    • MedTech100 Index
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
Home » Mixed messages on the merits of mammograms

Mixed messages on the merits of mammograms

November 27, 2012 By MassDevice staff

breast mammogram image

The latest published research on mammogram use and breast cancer trends in the U.S. offered mixed messages for women who must navigate betwen the dangers of missing mammograms as well as for getting over-treated as a result of them.

A new study released by the Radiological Society of North America warned that new federal recommendations regarding breast cancer screening could result in skipped mammograms and missed cancers.

Patients and doctors must reconcile that latest analysis with previous warnings that breast cancer screening may lead to more harm than good.

"Recommendations on screening mammography are extremely important public policy and we wanted to contribute to that dialogue," Dr. Elizabeth Arleo, who studied mammography screening trends along with a team of researchers at New York Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Medical College, said in prepared remarks. "We get questions all day long from patients and referring physicians on the appropriateness of screening mammography. The inconsistent information is very confusing for everyone."

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force in 2009 altered previous guidelines on mammograms, recommending screening every 2 years rather than annually for women between the age of 50 and 74 on the grounds that patients were being over-treated for tumors that would have been harmless.

The agency further recommended that women under the age of 50 who aren’t at increased risk of developing breast cancer may not need routine screening, and cautioned against teaching women under them to conduct breast self-examinations.

Results from Arleo’s study, which included over 43,000 screenings performed at Weill Cornell between 2007 and 2010, found that nearly 1 in 5 cancers picked up through mammograms were found in women under the age of 50.

"Nearly 20% of cancers detected with screening mammography were found among women in their 40s," according to Arleo. "It seems unacceptable to potentially miss nearly 20% of the breast cancers we are identifying. This, in our view, would represent a substantial degree of under-diagnosis."

Their findings support the American Cancer Society recommendations over those of the USPSTF, Arleo added.

Researchers earlier this year found that mammogram screening rates declined following the USPSTF’s controversial recommendation, which was rebuffed by the American Cancer Society and other groups when it was issued 3 years ago.

Screening rates declined 5.7% among women aged 40-49 following the USPSTF’s recommendation, with nearly 54,000 mammograms skipped in 2010, according to a Mayo Clinic analysis.

The USPSTF altered its recommendations in light of new data, including a randomized, controlled clinical trial and the Cancer Intervention & Surveillance Modeling Network’s modeling studies, finding that the risk of breast cancer false positives were higher for women aged 40-49 while the risk of developing breast cancer was lower than that of women over the age of 50.

USPSTF urged "the decision to start regular, biennial screening mammography before the age of 50 years should be an individual one and take patient context into account, including the patient’s values regarding specific benefits and harms."

Filed Under: Mammography, News Well, Research & Development, Women's Health Tagged With: American Cancer Society, Breast Cancer, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)

More recent news

  • Pixee Medical reports first knee arthroplasty cases using its augmented reality nav tech
  • Alpheus Medical raises $52M for ultrasound-activated tumor therapy
  • Elucent Medical wins FDA breakthrough nod for in-body spatial intelligence system
  • EndoQuest Robotics completes first cases in pivotal surgical robot trial
  • Study links Abbott CGM use to lower risk of hospitalizations due to heart complications

Primary Sidebar

“md
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest med device regulatory, business and technology news.

DeviceTalks Weekly

See More >

MEDTECH 100 Stock INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.
MDO ad

Footer

MASSDEVICE MEDICAL NETWORK

DeviceTalks
Drug Delivery Business News
Medical Design & Outsourcing
Medical Tubing + Extrusion
Drug Discovery & Development
Pharmaceutical Processing World
MedTech 100 Index
R&D World
Medical Design Sourcing

DeviceTalks Webinars, Podcasts, & Discussions

Attend our Monthly Webinars
Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

MASSDEVICE

Subscribe to MassDevice E-Newsletter
Advertise with us
About
Contact us

Copyright © 2025 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Privacy Policy