• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MassDevice

The Medical Device Business Journal — Medical Device News & Articles | MassDevice

  • Latest News
    • Cardiovascular
    • Orthopedics
  • Wall Street Beat
    • Funding Roundup
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Podcasts & Webinars
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars
  • Resources
    • About MassDevice
    • Newsletter Signup
    • Leadership in Medtech
    • Manufacturers & Suppliers Search
    • MedTech100 Index
    • Videos
    • Whitepapers
  • DeviceTalks Tuesdays
  • Coronavirus: Live updates
Home » Federal judge rejects $296 million Guidant plea deal

Federal judge rejects $296 million Guidant plea deal

April 27, 2010 By MassDevice staff

BSX, Guidant logos

A federal judge today rejected a $296 million plea agreement between the U.S. Justice Dept. and Boston Scientific Corp. (NYSE:BSX) subsidiary Guidant Corp. over faulty implantable defibrillators.

Earlier this month the Natick, Mass.-based medical devices giant, which paid $26 billion for Guidant in 2006, agreed to plead guilty to a pair of misdemeanor criminal charges for withholding information from the Food & Drug Administration: specifically, to making a materially false statement about its Ventak Prizm 2DR implantable defibrillator in a required submission and to failing to notify the agency of a “correction” to its Contak Renewal defibrillators. Several patients died due to flaws in the devices that Guidant knew about and moved to correct without notifying the FDA, according to court documents.

In November 2009, Boston Scientific announced that it would pay nearly $300 million to settle the case on behalf of Guidant, even though the alleged infractions occurred prior to its acquisition of the Indianapolis-based company.

But Judge Donovan Frank of the U.S. District Court for Minnesota shot down the plea deal, writing that the deal does not go far enough to address Guidant’s penchant for concealing problems with the devices.

"The Court concludes that two provisions of the Plea Agreement … are not in the best interests of justice and do not serve the public’s interests because they do not adequately address Guidant’s history and the criminal conduct at issue," Donovan wrote.

In February 2002, Guidant discovered a design flaw in the Ventak device, after receiving reports of failures. By April 2002, according to court documents, it had fixed the flaws and begun producing a corrected version of the device — but didn’t recall the defective products.

The company continued to sell the defective devices without revealing their design flaws and malfunctions. On March 13, 2005, 21-year-old Joshua Oukrop’s Ventak Prizm 2 DR short-circuited, killing him. Guidant told his doctor of the problems with the device, disclosed that it knew of 25 other such cases and told the physician that about 24,000 ICDs similar to Oukrop’s had been sold. When the doctor asked Guidant whether the other recipients would be told, the company said no, it did not want to “alarm” anyone, according to court documents. The company kept its word in subsequent Securities & Exchange Commission filings and press releases, never mentioning the defect or Oukrop’s death until an impending New York Times article that was to reveal the device’s flaws forced the company’s hand.

Patients who received the faulty devices —and two high-profile Minneapolis doctors, Robert Hauser and Barry Maron, who treated Oukrop— urged Donovan to reject the deal, arguing that "Guidant, as a company, does not respect the criminal justice system and should be required to do more than simply pay fines as a consequence for its criminal behavior," according to court documents.

But, as Donovan wrote in overturning the plea deal, the alleged victims “are not victims for the purposes of restitution in this case." That’s because the two counts Guidant pleaded guilty to concern only the filing of a false and misleading report to the FDA and a product update kept from the federal watchdog agency longer than the legally required 10-day deadline.

"There is nothing in the record to suggest that any person was harmed in any manner as a result of Guidant’s statement in August 2003 that the November 2002 change — which, by all accounts, made the device safer — did not affect the safety and efficacy of the Prizm,” Donovan wrote. "Much to the alleged victims’ and public’s frustration, Guidant’s motivation for when and how it described the November 2002 change, and for that matter the April 2002 change, makes no difference in the Court’s analysis of Count One, given the elements of the crime as charged in Count One."

As for the second count, Donovan wrote, "There is nothing in the record to suggest that any person was harmed in any manner as a result of Guidant’s failure to provide the FDA with a copy of that product update. In this way, the alleged victims’ reliance on Guidant’s failure to include certain facts about the Renewal failures in March 2005 is irrelevant for the purposes of defining "victim" as it applies to Count Two."

Nevertheless, the law pertaining to this case allows judges to deny plea agreements at their discretion. In rejecting this deal Donovan wrote that he believes "a term of probation would be appropriate in this case and could be fashioned in a manner to serve the public’s interest and address the accountability concerns raised by Drs. Hauser and Maron and likely shared by many others."

"At a minimum, the public’s interest in accountability would be served by Guidant and Boston Scientific being placed on probation, regardless of the fact that Boston Scientific acquired Guidant after the events in question. And, the Court believes that a period of probation would likely benefit, rather than harm, Guidant’s and Boston Scientific’s public image," he wrote. "For instance, as a condition of probation, Guidant, through Boston Scientific, could be ordered to perform community service designed to repair the harm caused by its offenses, namely to help build the public’s confidence in the FDA regulation process, the medical device manufacturers’ quality control efforts, and the cardiac healthcare industry in general. Indeed, Boston Scientific could be ordered, as a condition of probation and in addition to a criminal fine, to dedicate a certain amount of its resources to some of its already-established charitable programs. … Guidant, through Boston Scientific, could also be required to establish a compliance and ethics program, or if one is already established, to dedicate additional resources to that program to address the specific crimes in this case. Such a program could be overseen by a compliance officer skilled in the regulatory area and who perhaps could work in coordination with either the FDA or the Heart Rhythm Society, or both."

Donovan also urged that any revised plea deal include a stipulation that "a significant portion" of any fines be paid to the Medicare program, because it’s "possible that at least 15,000 of the devices at issue in this case went to Medicare recipients and that, as a result, Medicare likely incurred significant expenses related to the Prizm and Renewal devices."

Guidant can now withdraw its guilty plea, he added, cautioning that "if it chooses not to withdraw its guilty plea, the Court may then dispose of this case less favorably than the Plea Agreement contemplated." For it’s part, Boston Scientific is willing to discuss revisions to the deal, saying in a press release that "it plans to work with the DOJ in an effort to develop a modified plea agreement that is acceptable to the Court, the DOJ and the company."

And although Donovan is barred from participating in any discussions between the Justice Dept. and Guidant about a revised deal, "the Court notes that it would likely consider a modified agreement to be in the interests of justice if it addressed the concerns raised in this Order, specifically with respect to probation, community service, coordination with the FDA and any other appropriate regulatory agencies, and a discussion of where the fine and forfeiture funds will go."

The judge closed with an admonition to patients who received the faulty devices that, even if a revised deal goes through, it’s "highly unlikely" that they would be entitled to share in any penalties paid by Guidant to settle the case.

"As Guidant alluded to at the plea hearing, sophisticated medical devices, such as the ones at issue in this case, generally have a very high rate of reliability and provide life-saving benefits to many people. Advances in medical technology have, unfortunately, inflated the public’s expectations so much so that when any device fails, many assume that there must have been a crime committed or that someone is at fault. This is not necessarily always the case," Donovan wrote. "The Court recognizes the frustration that device recipients and the public may have for this criminal proceeding, and the Court is well-aware of the physical and emotional trauma caused by the Guidant recalls. But, as the Court repeatedly stated at the plea hearing, the only matter currently before the Court concerns the criminal case against Guidant and the conduct admitted to, specifically, on the Government’s charges concerning reports Guidant made to the FDA about the Prizm and Renewal devices. …

"Nothing in this Order is intended to give any person who considers herself or himself to be a victim of Guidant’s criminal conduct any expectation of future recovery through this proceeding. While such recovery is not entirely foreclosed through a possible remission petition, the Court believes that such recovery is highly unlikely.

Filed Under: Business/Financial News, Legal News, News Well Tagged With: Boston Scientific, Cardiac Rhythm Management, Guidant Corp.

In case you missed it

  • Abbott will spend $450M to up FreeStyle Libre production in Ireland
  • Acutus Medical ticks up on revenue beat, missed EPS in Q2 results
  • ResMed expects steady growth over the next year
  • Ambu is letting go of 200 employees
  • Medtronic has Class I recall for low-shock risk in ICDs
  • Titan Medical to start manufacturing Enos systems later this year
  • ZimVie sales down more than 11% in Q2 as it streamlines after spinoff
  • Cardinal Health’s CFO to move up to corner office
  • Levita Magnetics raises $26M for Magnetic-Assisted Robotic Surgery platform
  • Data supports use of Channel Medsystems Cerene cryotherapy
  • The 10 largest orthopedic device companies in the world
  • Nanopath raises $10M Series A for women’s health diagnostics
  • Avenda wins FDA IDE nod for AI-enabled prostate cancer therapy
  • NuVasive chief commercial officer Massimo Calafiore is stepping down
  • Preparing your medical device company for challenging market conditions
  • Dentsply Sirona replaces chief accounting officer amid internal investigation
  • Haemonetics stock rises on Street-beating Q1, raised guidance

RSS From Medical Design & Outsourcing

  • The 24 best medical device innovations of 2022
    The Galien Foundation recently announced its nominees of medical device innovations for its 2022 Prix Galien USA awards. There are 24 medical technologies nominated for the annual award this year, up from 18 nominees in 2021. The Galien Foundation’s annual Prix Galien awards highlight devices, biotechnology and pharmaceutical products designed to improve the human condition.… […]
  • FDA issues new COVID-19 testing guidance to avoid false negatives
    COVID-19 testing should be repeated following a negative result on any antigen test, the FDA said in a move that could increase demand for diagnostics manufacturers. The latest guidance from the federal health agency is for negative COVID-19 antigen test results regardless of the presence or absence of symptoms. The federal agency said recent studies… […]
  • Confluent Medical expands Costa Rica manufacturing footprint for nitinol, complex catheter production
    Confluent Medical Technologies this week announced the opening of its new addition to its Costa Rica manufacturing facility. The expansion adds 66,000 sq. ft to its large-scale manufacturing center of excellence in Alajuela, Costa Rica to expand Confluent’s capacity for nitinol component processing and complex catheter manufacturing. “Confluent has experienced consistent and strong growth in… […]
  • FDA’s breakthrough medical device designations tally nears 700
    Stewart Eisenhart, Emergo Group The US Food and Drug Administration has granted almost 700 designations over the past seven years under a voluntary program for expedited regulatory review of medical devices and combination products that facilitate more effective treatment or diagnosis of serious diseases. According to recent metrics published by FDA, the agency has issued a total of… […]
  • Lifecore Biomedical’s owner plans to go all-in on contract development and manufacturing
    Lifecore Biomedical parent company Landec Corp. (Nasdaq:LNDC) plans to take the subsidiary’s name, leadership and headquarters as its own and sell off food businesses to focus on contract development and manufacturing. Santa Maria, California-based Landec said it will rename itself as Lifecore Biomedical “in the near future” and change its Nasdaq ticker to LFCR. Landec… […]
  • COVID-19 immunity test developers at MIT seek diagnostic manufacturer
    MIT researchers have developed a device for predicting an individual’s COVID-19 immunity and are looking for a diagnostic company to get it manufactured in large numbers and approved by the FDA. The lateral flow test uses the same technology as at-home rapid antigen COVID-19 tests to measure neutralizing antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 in a blood sample,… […]
  • GE Healthcare picks AI imaging startups for inaugural Edison Accelerator
    GE Healthcare and Nex Cubed have selected seven companies focused on artificial-intelligence-augmented medical imaging for the first cohort of the Edison Accelerator in Canada. The companies will be matched with mentors and test their technologies with GE’s new Edison Digital Health Platform over the next three months. The program will end with innovation showcase presentations… […]
  • Boston Scientific whistleblower launches corruption investigation
    Boston Scientific (NYSE:BSX) is investigating claims that the company violated the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in Vietnam. Marlborough, Massachusetts–based Boston Scientific disclosed receipt of a whistleblower’s allegations in its latest filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. “In March 2022, the company received a whistleblower letter alleging Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations in Vietnam.… […]
  • 5 essential leadership lessons from Cathy Burzik for medtech’s next generation of women leaders
    Cathy Burzik, a seasoned senior executive in the healthcare industry, has successfully led major medical device, diagnostic, diagnostic imaging and life sciences businesses. Cathy Burzik, CFB Interests (as told to MedExecWomen co-founder Maria Shepherd) One key to being a successful women leader in MedTech: “Play nice, but play to win.” Cathy Burzik, who received a… […]
  • Stratasys plans to buy Covestro’s additive manufacturing business
    Stratasys (Nasdaq:SSYS) said today that it has a deal to purchase the additive manufacturing materials business of Covestro. The deal includes R&D facilities and activities, global development and sales teams across Europe, the U.S. and China, a portfolio of approximately 60 additive manufacturing materials, and hundreds of patents and patents pending, Stratasys said in a… […]
  • New implant design prevents scar tissue without drugs, MIT says
    Mechanically inflating and deflating an implantable device for 10 minutes a day prevents immune cells from building the scar tissue that has been a major obstacle for artificial pancreas researchers. That’s according to new findings from a team of MIT engineers who built mechanical deflection into a two-chambered, soft polyurethane device tested on mice. By… […]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

DeviceTalks Weekly

August 12, 2022
DTW – Medtronic’s Mauri brings years of patient care to top clinical, regulatory, scientific post
See More >

MEDTECH 100 INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.
Need Medtech news in a minute?
We Deliver!

MassDevice Enewsletters get you caught up on all the mission critical news you need in med tech. Sign up today.

MDO ad

Footer

MASSDEVICE MEDICAL NETWORK

DeviceTalks
Drug Delivery Business News
Medical Design & Outsourcing
Medical Tubing + Extrusion
Drug Discovery & Development
Pharmaceutical Processing World
MedTech 100 Index
R&D World
Medical Design Sourcing

DeviceTalks Webinars, Podcasts, & Discussions

Attend our Monthly Webinars
Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
Join our DeviceTalks Tuesdays Discussion

MASSDEVICE

Subscribe to MassDevice E-Newsletter
Advertise with us
About
Contact us
Add us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Connect with us on LinkedIn Follow us on YouTube

Copyright © 2022 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Advertise | Privacy Policy