MASSDEVICE ON CALL — The FDA this month issued a new proposal on the regulatory oversight of automated external defibrillators, but at least 1 medical device maker is worried that enhanced oversight may harm public safety.
Philadelphia-based CardioReady, maker of AED systems, urged that the FDA ensure that any new oversight not jeopardize the proliferation of AEDs, in the interest of public health.
"While much of the public commentary to date has focused on issues with a small subset of AEDs, the more important question should center on what is being done to save the hundreds of thousands of people who die in the United States every year from Sudden Cardiac Arrest," CardioReady chief medical officer Dr. Kevin Campbell said in prepared remarks. "Deployment and use of an AED within minutes of an SCA is the only practical lifesaving tool at our disposal."
The company noted that the few instances in which AEDs have failed to work as designed should not deter the public from turning to the potentially life-saving devices in case of emergency.
"It is imperative that the general public understand that AEDs perform as intended in the vast majority of circumstances and are overwhelmingly effective lifesaving tools," Campbell noted.
Is healthcare facing an "inevitable hack"?
Software experts warn that any system relying largely on code, including those that store and manage the world’s patient health data, are hackable – and it’s just a matter of time before someone makes a move.
Read more
Law firm solicits former Medtronic employees for shareholder lawsuit
A California law suit is investigating "potential breaches of fiduciary duties" among certain officers and directors at medical device giant Medtronic (NYSE:MDT), and is asking that former employees to come forward with any information regarding wrongdoing.
Read more
Congressman Markey vows his support for medtech tax repeal
Massachusetts Rep. Edward Markey (D) says he would have cast his vote against the medical device tax had he been involved with the recent Senate vote on a non-binding amendment to strike the levy.
Read more