• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

MassDevice

The Medical Device Business Journal — Medical Device News & Articles | MassDevice

  • Latest News
    • Cardiovascular
    • Orthopedics
  • Wall Street Beat
    • Funding Roundup
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Podcasts & Webinars
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars
  • Resources
    • About MassDevice
    • Newsletter Signup
    • Leadership in Medtech
    • Manufacturers & Suppliers Search
    • MedTech 100 Index
    • Videos
    • Whitepapers
  • DeviceTalks Tuesdays
  • Coronavirus: Live updates
Home » Boston Scientific loses bid to toss $19m pelvic mesh loss

Boston Scientific loses bid to toss $19m pelvic mesh loss

October 4, 2016 By Brad Perriello

Boston ScientificBoston Scientific (NYSE:BSX) yesterday lost its bid to overturn an $18.5 million loss in a product liability lawsuit brought by a quartet of women alleging that its Obtryx pelvic mesh caused their injuries.

A jury in West Virginia federal court in November 2014 found Boston Scientific liable to 4 women following a 10-day trial; the trial judge later ordered the Marlborough, Mass.-based company to pay each of the 4 women damages ranging from $3.25 million to $4.25 million (the 4th plaintiff later settled her case out of court and it was dismissed).

Boston Scientific last year asked Judge Joseph Goodwin, of the U.S. District Court for Southern West Virginia, to overturn the verdict, arguing that the plaintiffs failed to show that Obtryx is not reasonably safe because it’s within the standard of care for stress urinary incontinence. The plaintiffs also failed to link any of their injuries to specific design flaws, the company argued, and likewise didn’t prove their failure to warn claims. Boston Scientific also argued that the punitive damage awards were excessive and caused a miscarriage of justice.

Goodwin disagreed, declining to disturb the jury verdict because “there was more than sufficient evidence from which a reasonable jury could find in favor of the plaintiffs on each of their claims,” according to court documents.

“[Boston Scientific] 1st argues that the plaintiffs failed to establish that the Obtryx is ‘not reasonably safe’ because it is within the standard of care for the treatment of SUI. BSC conflates the standard for medical malpractice with that used for strict liability,” Goodwin wrote. “Here, the question is whether the manufacturer used reasonable care in designing the Obtryx.

“Accordingly, despite expert testimony indicating that use of the Obtryx is within the standard of care in the medical community, a reasonable jury could balance the risks and benefits based on the significant evidence the plaintiffs produced at trial on the Obtryx’s risks,” the judge wrote. “From this evidence, a reasonable jury could conclude that the risks associated with the Obtryx are not justified by its benefits and, as a result, the product is not reasonably safe.”

On the design defect claims, Goodwin found that “a reasonable jury could conclude that the Obtryx is not reasonably safe based on evidence of the specific defects discussed above (e.g. difficulty of removal; contraction, shrinkage, and banding; degradation; scarring).”

“Because I find that the plaintiffs’ experts specifically connected at least 1 of the above defects to each plaintiff’s injuries, a reasonable jury would have no need to ‘infer the existence of a defect by circumstantial evidence,'” he wrote. “The design defects discussed above, which were specifically linked to the plaintiffs’ injuries through expert testimony, likewise could have been revealed through clinical testing of the Obtryx. Therefore, a reasonable jury could find that BSC’s failure to conduct clinical trials before marketing the Obtryx proximately caused the plaintiffs’ injuries.

“In sum, BSC knew that safety issues can arise when a product does not undergo clinical testing, failed to respond to explicit warnings from the manufacturer that polypropylene should never be used permanently in the human body, and suggested hiding negative studies to physicians considering using the Obtryx. Drawing all inferences in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, I find that a reasonable jury could use this evidence to conclude that BSC’s conduct justified an award of punitive damages,” Goodwin wrote.

Boston Scientific alone is facing some 19,000 individual cases in the multi-district litigation over its pelvic mesh products, out of the more than 70,000 cases pending in MDLs against that company and other pelvic mesh makers including C.R. Bard (NYSE:BCR) and Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) subsidiary Ethicon, according to the documents.

Filed Under: Legal News, Product Liability, Wall Street Beat, Women's Health Tagged With: Boston Scientific, Pelvic Mesh Lawsuits

In case you missed it

  • Calyxo raises $32.7M for kidney stone treatment
  • Getinge anesthesia systems recall is Class I
  • RefleXion closes $125M debt facility
  • Senseonics announces equity grants to employees
  • New data backs Aerin’s RhinAer for treating chronic rhinitis
  • Enovis completes Insight Medical acquisition
  • Orchestra BioMed to go public, partner with Medtronic on cardiac neuromodulation therapy
  • Memic Innovative Surgery is now Momentis Surgical
  • Lyra Therapeutics appoints new chief medical officer
  • Masimo’s SafetyNet monitoring reduced length of COVID-19 hospital stays, study says
  • CeQur is launching a discreet, convenient ‘wearable insulin pen’
  • Teva appoints former Vertex exec as new head of R&D, CMO
  • Enovis partners with Kelvi on hot and cold therapies
  • West Pharmaceutical Services debuts new needle syringe system
  • Titan Medical names Cary G. Vance as new president, CEO
  • Acutus completes first closing in left-heart access portfolio sale to Medtronic
  • FDA clears Intuitive, Siemens Healthineers imaging integration for robotic bronchoscopy

RSS From Medical Design & Outsourcing

  • FDA can’t explain drop in device recalls, but experts point to COVID disruptions
    The FDA acknowledged interruptions with notifications from recalling firms during the pandemic, while regulatory experts point to fewer inspections and fewer procedures. FDA medical device product recalls dropped last year to their lowest level since 2013, according to a Medical Design & Outsourcing analysis of recall data from the regulatory agency. Medtech regulatory experts said the COVID-19… […]
  • DeviceTalks Boston 2022: Here’s what you missed on the show floor
    At DeviceTalks Boston 2022, there was a wealth of expertise to be had from exhibitors including Viant, ICS, PSN Labs, Propel and more. From stories of overcoming challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic to medical device materials pitfalls to avoid, MassDevice and MDO executive editor Chris Newmarker hit the DeviceTalks Boston show floor to discover insights. […]
  • Supply Chain EVP Greg Smith sees fewer suppliers in Medtronic’s future
    All eyes are on Medtronic’s global operations and supply chain leader as he works to modernize its operations and scrutinize suppliers. EVP of Global Operations and Supply Chain Greg Smith anticipates fewer suppliers in Medtronic’s future, he said in an interview this week. Smith spoke with DeviceTalks Editorial Director Tom Salemi in his first published… […]
  • CeQur is launching a discreet, convenient ‘wearable insulin pen’
    CeQur designed its Simplicity device to make insulin delivery as seamless as possible for people with diabetes. When it comes to managing diabetes, CeQur wants to make insulin therapy as convenient as possible. For those who prefer to manage their own insulin delivery, the Simplicity device might just do exactly that. Simplicity, a wearable, disposable… […]
  • Meddux opens new facility in Colorado
    Engineering, design, development and manufacturing company Meddux announced that it opened a new facility in Boulder, Colorado. The new, 22,000-square-foot facility doubles the overall square footage from its previous location in Colorado. According to a news release, it helps the company to quadruple its product development area and double its manufacturing footprint. Meddux’s new facility… […]
  • Reducing the Overall Cost of Validation
    By PTI Engineered Plastics Reliable medical devices and equipment are essential for researchers and doctors to accurately diagnose and treat a wide range of diseases. That is why there is such stringent oversight from the FDA to ensure these products meet the necessary requirements and specifications. To ensure compliance with regulators, manufacturers follow installation qualification… […]
  • BBS Automation has a deal to buy medtech supplier Kahle Automation
    BBS Automation said it plans to purchase high-speed automation supplier Kahle Automation to expand its medtech and life sciences business. Kahle will operate as Kahle – a BBS Company, according to a news release from Munich, Germany-based BBS and Lombardy, Italy-based Kahle. The deal is subject to regulatory approval. Terms were not disclosed. Kahle’s co-owners —… […]
  • How safe is health information after the overturning of Roe?
    The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services today issued guidance meant to better protect women’s health information as state abortion bans kick in after the U.S. Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade. Despite the HHS actions, women may still wonder whether their health information is entirely safe going forward — a potential challenge… […]
  • Dexcom focuses on early diabetes diagnosis as COVID links emerge
    New evidence is showing that COVID-19 may increase a person’s risk of diabetes, but it could be years until we know for sure. In the meantime, Dexcom (Nasdaq:DXCM) is getting ready, VP of Global Clinical Initiatives Tomas Walker said. Walker recently spoke with Medical Design & Outsourcing to discuss the San Diego-based diabetes device developer’s… […]
  • Blackrock Neurotech and Pitt work on first at-home BCI system for remote trials
    Blackrock Neurotech and the University of Pittsburgh’s Rehab Neural Engineering Labs (Pitt RNEL) are working together on the first portable brain-computer interface (BCI) to allow patients to participate in research trials from home. A Blackrock representative said it’s the final step as the company prepares to launch its first commercial product early next year. Salt… […]
  • How medical device companies are responding to abortion bans
    Days after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade’s protection of abortion rights, medical device companies are among those reassuring workers about healthcare access. Corporate communications to employees and the public at large come as trigger laws in nearly half of the states outlaw abortion immediately. Some medtech companies are not using… […]

Primary Sidebar

DeviceTalks Weekly

July 1, 2022
Boston Scientific CEO Mike Mahoney on building a corporate culture that drives high growth results
See More >

MEDTECH 100 INDEX

Medtech 100 logo
Market Summary > Current Price
The MedTech 100 is a financial index calculated using the BIG100 companies covered in Medical Design and Outsourcing.
Need Medtech news in a minute?
We Deliver!

MassDevice Enewsletters get you caught up on all the mission critical news you need in med tech. Sign up today.

MDO ad

Footer

MASSDEVICE MEDICAL NETWORK

DeviceTalks
Drug Delivery Business News
Medical Design & Outsourcing
Medical Tubing + Extrusion
Drug Discovery & Development
Pharmaceutical Processing World
MedTech 100 Index
R&D World

Device Talks Webinars, Podcasts, & Discussions

Attend our Monthly Webinars
Listen to our Weekly Podcasts
Join our Device Talks Tuesdays Discussion

MASSDEVICE

Subscribe to MassDevice E-Newsletter
Advertise with us
About
Contact us
Add us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Connect with us on LinkedIn Follow us on YouTube

Copyright © 2022 · WTWH Media LLC and its licensors. All rights reserved.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media.

Advertise | Privacy Policy | RSS