Dr. Andrew Wakefield, whose now-debunked research sparked the vaccines/autism debate, files a defamation suit against the British Medical Journal and one of its investigative reporters.
MASSDEVICE ON CALL — Dr. Andrew Wakefield, whose infamous 1998 research paper in The Lancet found a link between childhood vaccinations and autism, filed a defamation suit against the British Medical Journal and an investigative journalist over a series of articles published last year.
The articles by Brian Deer disclosed discrepancies between a Lancet study and the children's medical histories. Deer also unearthed financial ties between Wakefield and lawyers fighting against vaccine firms.
Commentaries by BMJ editor Fiona Godlee went so far as to charge Wakefield with deliberately "alter[ing] numerous facts about the patients' medical histories in order to support his claim to have identified a new syndrome," according to Medpagetoday.com.
Wakefield filed the lawsuit against Deer and BMJ in his adopted town of Austin, Texas, calling the articles "unfair, incorrect, inaccurate, and unjust."
The infamous doctor denied seeing some of the records cited by Deer in his articles before releasing his 1998 paper, saying it would thus have been impossible for him to deliberately mis-state their contents.
Wakefield has sued the publication in British courts in the past, according to the website. Wakefield was responsible for dropping each of the previous cases.
A federal jury in Texas clears Johnson & Johnson's DePuy Pinnacle hip implant in the 1st...
Edwards Lifesciences reports 3rd-quarter sales and earnings growth in excess of 20% and raises its...
A federal jury in Texas reportedly clears Johnson & Johnson's DePuy Pinnacle hip implant in the...
Federal auditors say the FDA needs to ramp up its cybersecurity efforts in order to deter hackers.