Analysis: Medical device tax revenues could top $2B next year coverage of the medical device tax

by Brad Perriello, Brian Johnson and Arezu Sarvestani

The medical device tax set to start next year has become a lightning rod for criticism, with the med-tech industry claiming it will be catastrophic for the industry and its critics claiming those concerns are overblown.

AdvaMed, the national lobby for the medical device industry, commissioned a pair of reports it says show that the tax will kill between 39,000 and 43,000 med-tech jobs and cost the industry between $670 million and nearly $7 billion. Countering those claims, Bloomberg Government issued a report of its own saying the real cost won’t be anything like that.

But a analysis of last year’s U.S. sales for nearly 50 of the largest medical device makers reveals two potential aspects of the tax that neither side addresses:

First, the tax could have a wildly disproportionate effect on med-tech companies, depending on their margins.

Sign up to get our free newsletters delivered straight to your inbox

Further, our analysis revealed that the tax, as currently constructed, is likely to generate far more revenue than the $2 billion a year it’s designed to deliver.

Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) told he isn’t surprised about our findings, saying that the politicians who wrote the law "knew what they’re doing" when they created the tax.

Sen. Scott Brown

Sen. Brown

"We can’t get any accurate numbers and the numbers that are coming out now are all over the place. It’s very frustrating that it’s so tough to get a straight answer," Brown told us.

Asked if it’s fair to call his position "repeal or bust," Brown dismissed the idea of altering the scope of the med-tech tax.

"It doesn’t help to modify it by going to a lower rate," he said. "No, the bottom line is the [tax] is just there to pay for a health care bill I didn’t support in the first place."

An uneven playing field

While the tax prescribes a flat 2.3% levy from all U.S. sales of medical devices, the effects would be wildly disproportional in practice.

For several companies that posted losses last year, the tax would have pushed them further into the red, and for a few companies it would have meant a swing from profitability to losses.

For more than 75% of the other companies on our list, the tax means lower profits by between 5% and nearly 50%. Take Integra LifeSciences (NSDQ:IART), which posted U.S. medical device sales of about $593 million last year, according to Integra’s annual report. A 2.3% whack would have taken $14 million off the top line – exactly half of Integra’s 2011 profits.

At the other end of the spectrum, there’s Sirona Dental Systems (NSDQ:SIRO) and the $256 million it logged in domestic medical device sales last year. Its tax tab, had the measure been in effect, would have been $6 million, or about 5% of its $122 million in profits.

Click here for a larger interactive version of this graph

For 6 of the med-tech companies on our list, the tax would have meant more red ink, ranging from 9% (Philips (NYSE:PHG)) to 934% (Orthofix (NSDQ:OFIX)). For 3 others, the tax would have pushed them from black to red. ConMed’s (NSDQ:CNMD) $1 million in profits would have turned to an $8 million loss; SonoSite’s (NSDQ: SONO) $1 million bottom line would have swung to a $3 million loss; and Symmetry Medical’s (NYSE:SMA) $3 million profit would have instead been a $3 million loss.

Bloomberg Government takes on AdvaMed’s report

Industry lobby AdvaMed issued its own analysis of the medical device tax last September, focusing on overall impacts to the industry. According to the study’s authors, the impending levy represents "the last straw on the camel’s back" for medical device companies trying to thrive in the struggling American economy, all but forcing companies to ship manufacturing overseas.

AdvaMed’s ominous projections got a lot of attention, especially from members of Congress already favorable to the industry, but it also caught the eye of Bloomberg Government analyst Christopher Flavelle, who deemed the entire report "not credible."

AdvaMed’s analysis concluded that the industry directly employs more than 400,000 in the U.S., and that "under reasonable assumptions, the tax could result in job losses in excess of 43,000 and employment compensation losses in excess of $3.5 billion."

The figure came from an economic analysis commissioned by AdvaMed and conducted independently by Diana Furchtgott-Roth, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, and Harold Furchtgott-Roth, former chief economist of the House Commerce Committee.

"We are not in a strong economic position," Diana Furchtgott-Roth told media during a September conference call when the report was released. "This is not the right time to impose a new tax."

The threat of 43,000 U.S. jobs lost became a rallying cry among industry supporters protesting the tax, including med-tech advocate Rep. Erik Paulsen (R-Minn.) who cited the figure in a letter, with 74 co-signers, sent to House leaders last month.

Medical device executives and related lobbies also used the estimate liberally, especially as companies such as Zimmer (NYSE:ZMH) and Stryker (NYSE:SYK) began announcing layoffs in efforts to cut costs ahead of the tax. But Bloomberg’s Flavelle cast a wary eye on the industry report, chiding it for exaggerating the impacts of the levy without enough solid evidence.

"AdvaMed’s "reasonable assumptions" conflict with economic research, overstate companies’ incentives to move jobs offshore, and ignore the positive effect of new demand created by the law," Flavelle wrote.

Flavelle’s arguments stemmed from a Bloomberg Government analysis that he also penned entitled "Medical Device Industry Overstates Tax Impact," in which he breaks down the assumptions underlying the AdvaMed report’s projections.

He argues that the study’s authors rely too heavily on hypotheticals that blow the tax’s potential impact out of proportion, especially in regard to the loss in revenue and shift to overseas manufacturing.

The AdvaMed report’s most salient projections include heavy layoffs, closure of U.S. plants in favor of overseas manufacturing, price increases on life-saving medical devices and reduced research & development budgets.

Flavelle concedes that the industry may take some hits, but believes losses in revenue attributable to increased prices may be partially or entirely recouped by the 23 million Americans newly insured under health care reform. He finds the threat of a flight overseas untenable, as "the tax by itself creates no specific financial incentive to move production," and he paints the 43,000 jobs lost estimate as little more than a wild guess.

"This industry, as with any industry, has a responsibility to its shareholders to maximize profits and minimize costs at all times, before the tax and after the tax," Flavelle told MassDevice. "The question isn’t whether there are incentives to cut costs – there are always incentives to cut costs. The question is, what new incentives are created by this tax to move jobs overseas?"

"If it’s more cost-effective for Company X to create devices in some other country, you’ve got to assume from the outside that they would do that in the absence of the tax," he added.

AdvaMed generally dismissed the point as an editorial representing one person’s take on the issue.

"Opinions are like noses," public affairs chief Gary Karr told MassDevice. "Everybody’s got one."

The industry lobby stood beside its study, maintaining that it’s the spirit of its conclusions that matter, not the numbers themselves.

"It’s almost kind of beside the point whether 42,000 is the right figure or 39,000 is the right figure or 10,000 is the right figure or even 8,000," Karr said. "It’s still a lot, that’s our point, not the specific number that it’s likely to be. We are certainly in danger of significant job loss because of the device tax."

"At the end of the day it’s really incontrovertible that the medical device tax is a danger to jobs in the medical device industry – it’s just a question of how much," Karr said. "I think for the people who have already been told that they’re going to be laid off by companies who have already announced that, I think 1 job lost because of the medical device tax is 1 too many."

RSS From Medical Design & Outsourcing

  • GlobTek presents its latest level VI AC/DC adapter and connverter
    T-43086-WWVV-X.X-Q Model is an addition to GlobTek’s Level VI compliant GT-43086 family and represents GlobTek’s 6 Watt wall plug-in series of AC/DC adapters (power supplies and chargers) with International Interchangeable blades. GlobTek’s changeable input blade system with individual field replaceable input plugs, including: North America and Japan NEMA 1-15P, Australian, UK BS 1363, European CEE […]
  • Sanmina’s familiarity with FDA gets skin treatment product to market fast
    The medical market for cosmetic devices is booming. However, quickly launching new products to meet demand is becoming more challenging because device manufactures face increased regulatory scrutiny. To help meet regulatory requirements, aesthetic and other medical-device OEMs are partnering with electronics manufacturing services (EMS) companies that also offer expertise with the FDA filings necessary to […]
  • Fluid connectors and quick disconnects for IVD equipment from CPC
    Colder Products Company (CPC) offers thousands of tubing connectors, quick disconnects and fittings for smart fluid handling in IVD and analytical equipment. Non-spill connectors speed testing throughput by eliminating drips, preventing air inclusion and increasing operator safety. Panel mount connectors can be added to existing equipment or bottle caps to provide secure, leak-free connections. Puncture […]
  • 310 Watt desktop medical power supply meets efficiency level VI requirements
    Power Partners releases a new 310 Watt medical grade desktop power supply from their PEAMD Series of AC and DC adapters. The 310 Watt unit is packed for ideal performance inside a compact case measuring 7.8 x 4 x 2 in. with a weight of only 3 lbs. The PEAMD310 Series is approved to the latest […]
  • Saelig introduces Multiple Instrument System MIS4 universal test system
    Saelig Company has introduced the ABI Electronics’ Multiple Instrument Station MIS4, an all-in-one testing tool that provides all commonly required test instruments in one compact programmable hardware module, mounted in a compact case or installed in a PC-drive bay. Controlled by ABI’s sophisticated SYSTEM 8 Ultimate PC software with a simple yet programmable operator interface, […]
  • AssurX announces document management software update for small to mid-size companies in FDA regulated industries
    AssurX, an enterprise quality management, risk and regulatory compliance solution provider, announces the release of the latest update to their AssurX document management software. The document management solution provides a cost-effective solution for small to medium sized companies faced with streamlined operations and is fully compliant for FDA regulated industries. Ideal solution for small to […]
  • Saelig presents new Amplicon Impact-R 1100F series computer
    Saelig Company announces the Amplicon Impact-R 1100F series, a fanless system powered by the Intel ATOM D2550 processor. Configured with a high performance 2.5 in. MLC Solid State Drive (SSD), the Impact-R 1100F series is a silent controller system. With options for multiple serial communication ports, the Impact-R 1100F can offer up seven DB9 connections […]
  • Gerresheimer to acquire Centor
    Gerresheimer AG, a partner to the global pharmacy and healthcare industry, will further extend its pharmaceutical packaging business with the acquisition of Centor. Gerresheimer has reached an agreement with Nemera Development S.A. to acquire 100% of the share capital of Centor US Holding. “Centor is the highly profitable market leader for plastic vials and closures in […]
  • Methods Machine Tools presents the new Nakamura-Tome NTRX-300
    Methods Machine Tools, a developer of precision machine tools and automation, has introduced the new Nakamura-Tome NTRX-300, a multitasking turning center featuring complete parts machining in one operation, with a built-in load and unload automation system and advanced operator recognition management software. The NTRX-300 features true opposing twin spindles: an 8 in. A2-6 25 HP or […]
  • MSC Apex Diamond Python and Smart Midsurface speeds modeling to validation
    MSC Software announced a new release of MSC Apex, the company’s award-winning next generation Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) platform. The MSC Apex Diamond Python release introduces: · The fourth release of MSC Apex Modeler is a CAE Specific direct modeling and meshing solution that streamlines CAD clean-up, simplification and meshing workflow. New in this release is […]
  • Quality Metrics: FDA’s plan for a key set of measurements to help ensure manufacturers are producing quality medications
    Editor’s Note: This article is written by Ashley Boam and Mary Malarkey from the “FDA Voice” blog. Boam is an FDA’s acting Director of the Office of Policy for Pharmaceutical Quality, the Office of Pharmaceutical Quality and the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Malarkey is an FDA’s Director if the Office of Compliance and Biologics Quality […]

Leave a Reply